What BEPS Pillar Two Means For Your Business
What is BEPS Pillar Two?
BEPS, or Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, refers to methods used by multinational corporations to move profits to low-tax jurisdictions, thereby undermining the tax base of higher-tax countries. Pillar Two is one of two major solutions proposed by the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework to solve this issue.Who Does it Apply to?
For multinational enterprise (MNE) groups with combined revenues of more than €750 million, 2026 marks the shift from modeling to required compliance. Pillar Two uses the Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) Rules, which function as a “top-up” mechanism. If a corporation pays less than 15% tax in each jurisdiction, another country takes over to collect the difference. This is accomplished by two interlocking rules:- Income Inclusion Rule (IIR): The parent company’s home nation taxed the low-taxed income of its foreign subsidiaries at a minimum of 15%.
- The Undertaxed Profits Rule (UTPR) is a backstop mechanism that allows other group entities’ jurisdictions to collect any residual top-up tax that the IIR has not gathered.
Why Does It Matter?
Pillar Two increases compliance complexity for impacted corporations by requiring them to compute their Effective Tax Rate (ETR) on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis each year and determine if any top-up tax is needed. It also radically alters the decision-making process for firms over where to establish operations, hold intellectual property, and arrange their finances. In short, Pillar Two represents one of the most significant changes to international tax in decades, and huge multinational corporations must now comply with it.2026 Compliance Snapshot
| Requirement | Applies To | Deadline (Calendar-Year Group) | Risk if Delayed |
| GloBE Information Return (GIR) | Groups ≥ €750m revenue | 30 June 2026 | Penalties & regulatory scrutiny |
| UK Multinational Top-up Tax | UK-parented groups | Corp tax cycle alignment | Cash flow exposure |
| Domestic Top-up Tax | UK entities in scope | Corp tax payment deadline | ETR misstatement |
| Safe Harbour Documentation | Eligible groups | Before GIR submission | Loss of transitional relief |
| Internal Controls Documentation | All in-scope groups | Pre-filing | Audit & governance risk |
Why 2026 Is Operationally Complex
While many multinational corporations spent 2023-2025 completing high-level impact assessments and scoping activities under Pillar Two, the disconnect between strategic planning and operational implementation is now stark. The year 2026 marks the point at which theoretical readiness is tested against actual filing obligations, and most organisations discover that their current systems, processes, and data architecture were not designed for this level of granularity.Automated Jurisdiction-Level ETR Calculations
The Effective Tax Rate (ETR) under GloBE standards must be determined separately for each constituent entity jurisdiction, rather than at a group or regional level, as many traditional tax systems were built to do. This necessitates gathering entity-level financial data, applying complicated GloBE modifications, and performing calculations across potentially dozens of countries at once. Manually performing this task is error-prone and unsustainable on a large scale; automating it necessitates significant investment in tax technology and clean, structured data. Many businesses are discovering that their ERP systems do not generate data in the format or granularity that Pillar Two requires.GloBE-Adjusted Deferred Tax Recalculations
Pillar Two does not merely employ IFRS or local GAAP deferred tax data from the financial statements. Deferred tax balances must be reassessed under GloBE-specific criteria, such as applying the 15% minimum rate cap, removing certain temporary disparities, and accounting for Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-up Taxes (QDMTTs). This results in a parallel deferred tax computation that sits alongside – but differs from – the statutory accounts, adding a substantial layer of complexity for tax and finance teams who must now manage two reconcilable sets of deferred tax situations.Download the BEPS Pillar Two (UK) – 2026 Filing Readiness Checklist
Ensure your GloBE Information Return is audit-ready before the 30 June 2026 deadline.
Substance-Based Income Exclusion Modelling
The Substance-Based Income Exclusion (SBIE) enables businesses to exclude a percentage of their revenue from top-up tax calculations, based on personnel costs and the carrying value of tangible assets in each jurisdiction. While this can significantly lower a company’s top-up tax liability, effectively calculating the exclusion necessitates reliable, jurisdiction-level data on qualifying assets and personnel, which are frequently stored in HR, fixed asset, or operational systems that are not connected with tax reporting workflows. Modeling the SBIE dynamically, rather than as a one-time estimate, necessitates continuous data feeds and validation processes, which most organisations have yet to implement.
Structured Data Reconciliation Across ERP Systems
Large multinational corporations frequently use several ERP instances, with varying charts of accounts, entity hierarchies, and data definitions across jurisdictions. All this data must be reconciled into a single, consistent GloBE information report to be compliant with Pillar Two. Disparities between systems, in the absence of a strong data governance framework, can result in incorrect ETR estimates, missed filing deadlines, and penalties. This is why Pillar Two is ultimately about data governance, rather than just tax policy.
The Parallel with Other Structured Reporting Regimes
The operational complexity of Pillar Two is not unprecedented. Organisations that have completed iXBRL filing with HMRC, Country-by-Country Reporting using the OECD XML schema, or ESEF digital financial reporting using ESMA’s framework will recognise the same underlying challenges: structured data requirements, taxonomy mapping, validation rules, and the need for audit-ready outputs. The lesson learnt was identical across all these regimes: early investment in validated, structured digital reporting dramatically decreases submission risk, regulatory scrutiny, and last-minute remedial expenses.
Where DataTracks Fits
DataTracks has built its capabilities precisely around these structured compliance frameworks, supporting organisations across iXBRL, CbCR, ESEF, and related regimes globally.
Data & Systems: The Hidden Risk Area
Common readiness gaps identified in 2026 include:
1. Misalignment BetweenCbCR& GloBE Data
CbCR and GloBE calculations are based on distinct approaches, therefore values may differ despite appearing consistent. Because safe harbour eligibility is dependent on precise CbCR measures, any mismatch can invalidate relief and result in full top-up tax calculations – a risk that is exacerbated when the two datasets are managed by separate teams or systems.
2. Deferred Tax Recalculation Errors
GloBE has its own regulations for recognizing deferred tax, which differ from IFRS and US GAAP norms. Companies risk misstating their GloBE effective tax rate and miscalculating top-up tax obligations if existing deferred tax balances are not recalculated to reflect these revisions, which might result in substantial inaccuracies in financial reporting.
3. Spreadsheet Dependency
Manual spreadsheet-based consolidation carries high risk due to formula errors, version control concerns, and a lack of access safeguards. As Pillar Two data volumes increase across jurisdictions, this dependency reveals a glaring control weakness, one that auditors are increasingly focusing on and making continuous, dependable compliance difficult to maintain.
4.Limited Audit Trail
Pillar Two includes several judgment-based assumptions that boards, audit committees, and tax authorities want to be clearly documented and managed. Without a robust audit trail detailing how positions were formed and who approved them, organisations have increased audit exposure and find it substantially more difficult to defend their Pillar Two stances when questioned.
Final Thoughts: 2026 Is a Governance Test
BEPS Pillar Two is more than just a compliance deadline; it represents a systemic change towards global tax transparency. Organisations that invest today in streamlined digital reporting, validated submission procedures, secure data governance, and cross-functional compliance controls will not only meet the 2026 deadline but also have greater long-term regulatory resilience.
The question now is not whether to prepare, but how effectively.
DataTracks operates across 25+ countries and supports over 30,000 enterprises globally, highlighting the importance of structured regulatory alignment.
Learn more about how we can help here
